Sunday, January 16, 2011

Sinking of the ROKS Cheonan - North Korean Aggression or Friendly Fire?

The recent tension on the Korean peninsula, beginning last March, stems from the sinking of a South Korean Pohang class corvette, the ROKS Cheonan. On Friday, 26 March 2010, an explosion was reported to have occurred near the Cheonan, near the stern of the ship at 9:22 p.m. local time. The ship, which broke in half off of Baengnyeong Island in South Korean waters, had previously participated in a large anti-submarine warfare training exercise 8 days previously. 40 South Korean sailors were confirmed dead, and 6 missing. Rough waters caused the poorly executed rescue operation to cost more lives when a Cambodian freighter collided with a privately owned vessel participating in the rescue. Immediate South Korean response to the sinking of the ship stressed that there was no indication of North Korean involvement.



Although initial reports played down the possibility of North Korean involvement, as the days passed, South Korean "leaks" indicated that a North Korean miniature submarine could have launched a torpedo into the Cheonan. Pro-Government newspapers began publishing reports of North Korean involvement, indicating a torpedo had hit the Cheonan, causing it to split in half. Parts of an intact torpedo were shown as evidence, complete with North Korean markings and production numbers.

This is a picture of the North Korean torpedo that supposedly hit the Cheonan. The problem with this, however, is that a torpedo like the one supposedly launched at the Cheonan, would be traveling 40-50 knots, and would leave no distinguishable remains like the propeller. South Korean and American investigations "confirmed" North Korean involvement with its own investigation. Independent investigations, as well as Chinese reports, pointed towards a floating mine. Russian investigations reportedly agreed. The argument for a friendly fire incident can be attributed to the NATO-grade explosive residue found on the Cheonan. North Korean torpedoes would not be using NATO weaponry. The sinking was also well within South Korean waters, and close to a large anti-submarine base, which would have easily detected the poorly made North Korean submarines.

I personally doubt that the North Koreans were involved, but I'd like to know your opinions!

16 comments:

  1. what is this friendly fire you speak of lol? North korea =/= friendly

    ReplyDelete
  2. Korean Air Lines flight 007 crashed into it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Agression, but what is the correct response for this kind of "war"?

    ReplyDelete
  4. There wasn't too big of a fuss about it here in Europe, at least not where I live. dunno why

    ReplyDelete
  5. Best Korea did it, Kim Jong's just an attention whore

    ReplyDelete
  6. i like the north korea. i dont think that they are involved

    ReplyDelete
  7. thanks for the comment. following you. i'm very interested in the NK situation. nice post

    ReplyDelete
  8. I wouldn't believe it. Every time someone wants to start a war it is always some phantom incident like this they use to start the beating of the war drums... No, I ain't buying it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. They need to settle it with a Starcraft tourney.

    ReplyDelete
  10. interesting analysis. looking forward to more posts.

    ReplyDelete
  11. world war 3 :(

    bomb shelter anyone?

    ReplyDelete
  12. something fishy is going on there

    ReplyDelete